Home Page
 
 

November 2005 Informational Meeting

With all the talk about flip tax increases, garage irregularities, and the never-occurring Meet The New Board Members event, the only quiet people were on our Board. I sent the following letter to Board Members and an informational meeting was announced immediately thereafter. How's that for results?




November 4, 2005

 
 

Dear Neighbors who happen to be Board Members:

I have deep appreciation for the work our Board performs on behalf of the Seward Park Housing Corporation. I have tried to communicate this appreciation and to demonstrate that it is not my goal to disparage you when presenting issues. Still, I am deeply troubled by the lack of communications that characterizes your work.

With regard to the garage: By correlating the information I gleaned from our meeting, I made the startling conclusion that while 6 or 7 spots were allocated during the time I asked about, only 3 people from the waiting list were allocated spots within that timeframe. I asked about this and have received no response. At that meeting, Board Members agreed that receipts would be given to shareholders when they get added to the garage waiting list, but I have neighbors who have asked to be added to the waiting list since then, and none has received a receipt. Prior to that meeting, Stanley Friedland advised me that a new Garage List that addresses the errors would be published "in a few days". It is two months since that statement was made, and no new list has been published.

With regard to communications: In August we were promised a "Meet The New Board" event to be scheduled in September. There hasn't been even a whisper of such an event since then, and I have received no reply to my inquiry on this topic. Just a few days ago, and after nearly six months, a flyer was distributed showing the outcome of the Lobby survey. I asked for simple clarification regarding the breakdown of votes and did not receive a response.

My concerns don't address subtle points of policy or disclosure of information over which there may be controversy. They address basic points of information that I, as a shareholder, have a right to know.

Several of you say that you are open to communications, that you are approachable, and that I should call. While one-on-one communications may truly be your personal preferences, the impression I get is of a Board that does not want to put anything in writing and does not want to communicate with shareholders on the issues that concern them. I beseech you to disprove that impression.

My emails are regularly polite, substantial and sincere. They warrant a response. I once again respectfully ask for information regarding these outstanding issues.

Dan Strum





Return to Previous Page